The U.S presidential election is imminent and, not surprisingly, politics are dominating everyone’s conversations. Last week a work colleague and I had an on-going discussion of whether brands have political connotations.
We started with an observation about cars in the office parking lot: more Republicans own BMW’s while more Democrats own Jeeps. Cars turned into sports: Democrats prefer football while Republicans prefer baseball. We tried to find a pattern with fast food restaurants but couldn’t.
My colleague then speculated that logo color might reveal something about political leanings. Coca-Cola, Verizon, and Oracle would all be considered Republican while Pepsi, AT&T, and SAP would be Democratic. Chick-fil-A’s red logo seems to be consistent with their recent political controversy.
While it’s an intriguing notion, the theory didn’t stand up to a little on-line sleuthing. The neuro-insight research firm Buyology studied consumers’ non-conscious connections to brands and discovered variations by political affiliation:
| Democrats | Republicans | |
| Most Desired Car | Jeep | BMW |
| Most Desired Electronics | Sony | Sharp |
| Most Desired Insurance | Progressive | Allstate |
| Most Desired Restaurant | Wendy’s | Subway |
| Most Desired Coffee Shop | Starbucks | Dunkin’ Donuts |
Allstate’s blue logo disproves our theory but at least we got the cars correct.
It turns out trying to associate brands with political preferences is a popular topic. According to consumer research firm YouGov, which ranked 1,100+ brands for quality, value, and willingness to recommend, the top brands for each political party are as follows:
| Democrats | Republicans |
| Fox News Channel | |
| Amazon.com | History Channel |
| Cheerios | Craftsman |
| Clorox | Chick-fil-A |
| Dawn | Johnson & Johnson |
The results seem to imply Republicans watch more TV while Democrats spend more time on-line.
Even social media has joined in. The digital agency Engage cross-referenced polling data with influence and Facebook “likes” to correlate food preference with politics. Their conclusion? “Conservatives like Cracker Barrel, while Red Bull leans left.”
Infographic by engage
I don’t know if any of this can be used to project the election winner but it’s good fun.
So readers, what do you think? Do your politics fit these brand preferences?
Manage By Walking Around 
Reblogged this on catherinephung.
Reblogged this on yasniger and commented:
it just made me laugh really
[…] This blog was originally posted on Manage By Walking Around. […]
Interesting post! I’m surprised by the Starbucks vs. Dunkin’ Donuts preference—-I thought for sure Starbucks would be a Republican thing! Congrats on being FP!
Same here, and I also would have guessed Democrats prefer Subway.
Me too. Subway seems a very Democrat brand.
This is a good one! Going to reblog for sure. I also blog about these topics, feel free to check me out! http://bit.ly/S4a6ID
As an independent voter, it is pretty hilarious! Love the Cheerios and Craftsman difference as well as Clorox and Chick-fil-A.
Congrats on being Freshly Pressed!
Interesting. As far as color goes, I do know that most advertising done for food use warm, earth tones. It’s believed that these colors (red, orange, yellow, green, brown, etc.) create hunger in the subconscious. 🙂 Enjoyed your post.
Huh… Is this why big companies donate so much to political campaigns?
Ok then, basically you are saying that the Democrats are happy with the essetials while the Republicans will go for the finer things in life? The common man versus the elites???
Interesting interpretation but probably too simplistic.
Simply sharing information; form your own conclusions. Thanks.
I am not sure if they do fit those brands but I will be glad when the elections are over, how about you?
I’m always ready for the next new thing because it gives me ideas for future posts…
So True! Thanks for sharing.
I think Progressive gets so much Democratic support because “progressive” means something like “liberal” in political terms. So even the Progressive vs. Allstate thing makes a kind of sense.
As for the color thing, I don’t really know. I’ve always thought of the red color as a left thing for some reason, and over in Europe the social democratic parties seem to like the color red, since they use it a lot. But hey, interesting post!
Fascinating! I’m not sure how far one could read into this, but it would be interesting to flesh out a full argument about how these branding patterns reflect the values and ideas of the political parties. Thanks for sharing!
This reminds me of some of Philip Cohen’s google correlation charts at familyinequality.wordpress.com. Not entirely scientific but still quite interesting.
I would think that the most desired Republican restaurant would be Chick-Fil-A… but of course, I could be wrong.
Reblogged this on UC Berkeley's Student Dietetic Association.
Politics like everything else in the US uses consumerism and ads to get were they want to be.
I’m British, so some of these brands (like Chick-fil-A and Craftsman) mean nothing to me. Starbucks, of course, I know well: if it’s more readily identified with Democrats maybe its connected with the coffee chain’s Seattle origins.
I would have thought Jeeps would be more popular with Republcans, since they’re more practical than BMWs in rural areas.
[…] The Politics of Brand. […]
It’s definitely an interesting idea.
Reblogged this on Kituok07’s Blog.
[…] This blog was originally posted on Manage By Walking Around. […]